What We Can Glean From Previous Bear Markets

We chose three different metrics to evaluate previous bears: the length of time to reach a bottom, the depth of the drawdown, and starting vs. bottom valuations. 

For our valuation measurement, we chose to use the CAPE ratio because trailing 12-month earnings are highly volatile during recessions, thus skewing the P/E ratio. Using forward earnings estimates has historically had the highest error rate both going into and coming out of recessions. The benefit of the CAPE is that it uses 10 years of earnings, which helps mitigate any short-term earnings noise and provides a more persistent/stable earnings measure. 

Figure 1

S&P 500 Index Bear Markets by the Numbers

Start Bottom  Bottom %  Months to 
Bottom
Starting 
CAPE 
 Bottom 
CAPE
8/3/1956 10/22/1957 -22% 15 19x 14x
12/2/1968 5/26/1970 -36% 18 22x 14x
1/8/1973 10/4/1974 -48% 21 19x 9x
12/1/1980 8/12/1982 -27% 21 9x 7x
7/17/1990 
10/11/1990  -20% 3 16x  15x
3/27/2000  10/9/2002 -49%  31  44x  22x
10/10/2007  3/9/2009  -57%  17  26x  13x
2/20/2020  3/23/2020 -34% 1 31x  26x
1/4/2022  10/12/2022  -25% 9 37x  28x
Medians -35% 18 20x 14x
Averages -37% 16 23x 15x
Post-1995 Average* -47% 16 33x 20x

As of 10/22. Sources: FactSet for S&P 500 Index price return for drawdown data, FRED for recession dates, Robert Shiller’s “Irrational Exuberance” for CAPE ratios. Current drawdown is not included in averages or medians.

Of the eight bear markets accompanied by a recession in the S&P 500 Index since 1956, the average CAPE ratio at the bottom of the sell-off was about 15x (FIGURES 1 and 2). We analyzed the bottom CAPEs relative to their historical CAPEs (FIGURE 1). From this perspective, bears historically have hit bottom when stocks reached about bottom-quartile cheapness and the multiple compressed by 35% on average.
 

Bears historically have hit bottom when stocks reached about bottom-quartile cheapness.

Figure 2

We’re Still Well Above the Average Bear CAPE Bottom
Historical S&P 500 Index CAPE Ratios

box and whisker chart for bear markets in table 1

As of 12/31/22. Source: Robert Shiller, “Irrational Exuberance”

Most Attractive Equity Styles Today

Given the broad market sell-off, we thought it might be useful to look deeper into styles. In FIGURE 3, we can see that US small-cap value and US small-cap growth are below their bear-market bottom P/Es (black dashed lines). Yet even with 2022’s pullback, US large-cap growth remains historically expensive: its P/E multiple would need to compress another 23% to reach its average bear-market bottom.   

Figure 3

Growth Has More Room to Fall

Index Current Percentile
Russell 1000 Value  41%
Russell 2000 Value  2%
Russell 1000 Growth  65%
Russell 2000 Growth  3%

US Equity Historical P/E Ratios (December 2002–December 2022)

box and whisker charts for historical P/E ratios

As of 12/31/22. Historically, 0 is cheapest and 100th percentile is most expensive. Source: FactSet. 

In international markets, we observed a similar trend from a large-cap perspective: Value is currently attractively priced while growth remains historically expensive (red circles in FIGURE 4). Contrary to US markets, however, broad international equities continue to be priced at an attractive level, both historically and within a bear-market context.  

A final key observation is that bottom-quartile cheapness seems to be the historical inflection point for previous bear markets both at home and abroad: All US and international equity styles’ average bear-market bottom P/Es (black dashed lines) are around the 25th percentile (FIGURES 3 and 4).

Figure 4

International Equities (Especially Value) Are Attractively Priced

Index Current Percentile
MSCI World ex USA Value 
2%
MSCI World ex USA  12%
MSCI World ex USA Growth  82% 

International Equity Historical P/E Ratios (December 2002–December 2022)

As of 12/31/22. Source: FactSet.

Which Asset Classes/Styles Perform Best Coming Out of a Bear Market?

Based on the average duration, total price decline, and ending valuation of previous bear markets, we don’t think we’re quite out of the woods yet. 

Rather than trying to guess when we’ll reach the official end, investors who are ready to prepare for the next bull market now may want to focus on styles with more cyclicality that can benefit from economic recovery. FIGURE 5 shows various asset-class returns one year after the market reached its bear-market bottom. 

FIGURE 5
Small Caps and Value Stocks Have Performed Well Exiting Bear Markets
Asset-Class Returns One Year After Bear-Market Trough (1970–Present)

callan chart

As of 12/31/22. US Large Value is a portfolio represented by the top 30% of 1,000 US stocks based on composite value (as defined by multiple, equally weighted valuation metrics to arrive at an aggregated valuation metric. Valuation metrics include: P/E, EBITDA/EV, operating cash flow/EV, revenue/EV, dividend yield, and B/P yield (used only in financials and real estate as a replacement to EBITDA/EV). Portfolios constructed using composite value are not neutralized or weighted at the sector level. US Large Growth is a portfolio represented by the bottom 30% of 1,000 US stocks based on composite value. US Small Value is represented by a portfolio of the top 30% of US small-cap equities based on composite value. US Small Growth is represented by a portfolio of the bottom 30% of US small-cap equities based on composite value. International represented by the MSCI World ex USA Index. Sources: Bloomberg and Compustat; calculations by Hartford Equity Modeling Platform for Portfolios. 

Investment Implications

Here are a few things to consider for portfolio positioning while staying invested and preparing for the next bull.

Defensive Equities – Have historically held up better than the broad market during periods of extended volatility.

Value and Small-Cap Equities – Have tended to outperform during periods of above-trend inflation and during the beginnings of bull markets.

Large-Cap Growth Is Still Expensive – At this point in the drawdown, US growth still appears to be the most expensive asset class relative to its own history, while small value and international value are the cheapest relative to their own history.

For more insights to help clients stay invested, contact your Hartford Funds representative.