Consider Focusing on Structural Winners and Companies With Strong Competitive Positions
Generally speaking, AI-exposed stocks and high-momentum stocks have come under selling pressure year-to-date as investors have rotated out of areas with higher valuations. Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, and Broadcom, to take a few examples, saw their share prices fall despite strong fundamentals and earnings. In each case, the companies benefit from secular growth trends and a strong competitive position, which we believe could help drive share price outperformance longer term.
Similarly, quality companies that think about long-term planning, supply-chain resilience and diversification, and customer relationships ought to be better able to navigate these tariffs and consequential changes in the competitive landscape. These types of companies can typically see selling pressure initially at times of heightened uncertainty and market risk, but could potentially offer greater risk-adjusted returns as trade dynamics adjust and markets normalize.
For sectors in the crosshairs of the trade policy, we believe the focus should be on companies with a strong competitive position that should drive pricing power, longer order back-logs as uncertainty impacts capital expenditure decisions, and greater domestic exposure.
Clearly, industries less affected by trade disputes, such as banks, healthcare, and utilities, may provide some respite from tariff-driven uncertainty. Areas that offer defensive growth attributes may also fare better since their relative earnings stability delivers resilience at times of increased economic risk and uncertainty.