While economic fundamentals have been a source of relative calm for markets, political noise is rising in this important election year. Whether that will have a sustained impact on markets is another matter. We’re loath to predict political outcomes. We have more conviction in our view that the fundamental backdrop of decent growth, moderating inflation, and credible monetary policy has staying power and is bullish for risk assets⁴ despite high valuations. In the US, we see signs that growth is slowing and there’s a bit more slack in labor markets. Service inflation remains sticky, specifically shelter, but the path is pointing downward. That leaves the Fed in a position to ease eventually, which could support equities and bonds.

Of course, politics can’t be ignored. The success of France’s right wing in the European Union (EU) elections and President Emmanuel Macron’s announcement of a snap election spooked bond markets last month. Populist-driven spending proposals by the National Rally party on top of a French budget deficit of 5.5% of GDP drove the spread between French and German 10-year bond yields to its widest level since early 2017, when French fiscal concerns also arose.

However, we don’t see this growing into a systemic issue for a couple of reasons. First, we don’t see an EU breakup as a risk, although its fiscal rules and institutional setup face challenges. Second, as we saw in the UK in 2022, France in 2017, and Greece in 2015, markets can impose discipline on politicians when fiscal policies are deemed profligate. Even if a crisis were to ensue, the European Central Bank (ECB) would likely be a buyer of last resort at some level of risk-premia spike. We’ll be watching for politically induced market disruptions elsewhere, too, but we don’t think they’ll be sustained enough to influence our 12-month view. Ultimately, a divided US Congress could curb spending, while the UK election will likely have little impact on markets and may even yield a better outlook.

We were turning more positive on Europe given evidence of improvement in earnings and market breadth, but the resumption of political uncertainty has given us pause, so we’re maintaining our neutral regional view. Still, valuations are compressed relative to global equities, and the discount is even more pronounced in the UK, where underperformance has been driven by weakness in both relative earnings and sentiment.

In the US, we’ve also turned neutral. We think earnings will likely broaden out with little or no expected valuation expansion, and with large-cap tech likely to normalize as other sectors catch up (FIGURE 2).

Within sectors, we have an overweight view on financials, utilities, and consumer discretionary, and an underweight view on materials, staples, and communications. We maintain our neutral view on information technology.

Government Bonds: Multiple Themes Acting on Rates

Disparate factors popped up over the second quarter to drive moves in government bonds in DMs. In the US and Germany, central-bank easing is on the horizon and bond yields have rallied. The government-bond markets in each of these countries got a boost from their safe-haven status relative to France, where the spread to Germany rose in response to the political shift to the far right. Other “weak links” in southern Europe also saw spreads rise. In Japan, yields moved higher as the BOJ’s measured policy appeared out of sync with rising inflation and a weak yen.

In the US, softening growth and decelerating inflation could pave the path for the Fed to cut rates at least once this year.

We’ve moved from a neutral view to a moderately overweight view on duration because we have higher conviction that central-bank easing will be the primary driver of rates over our 12-month horizon. In the US, we’ve seen more evidence that growth is softening (albeit from strong levels), including in manufacturing, consumption, and employment, and that inflation is decelerating. We think this may be paving the path for the Fed to cut rates at least once this year following the ECB’s first rate cut in June. We also think the BOJ could remain patient given the recent negative GDP print, and we note that the high carry makes shorting Japan duration expensive.

The big question is on term premia⁵ and the extent to which France’s deficit concerns could ensnare a wider set of countries with similar issues. As of this writing, prior to the French Parliament elections, we think a French/German premium will persist but could widen further with a far-left majority and their even more ambitious spending plans. The US could face its own debt problems, of course, given that both presidential candidates share a predilection to spend beyond their means. However, the US dollar’s reserve status could tip flows toward US Treasuries in a eurozone-crisis scenario. Our view is that the environment is ripe for disruption but that markets could force politicians away from extreme policies. Either way, we expect higher rate volatility to persist and think investors need to be quite tactical to capture opportunities.

Credit: Still Attractive Despite Tight Spreads

With economic growth remaining solid, inflation receding, interest-rate cuts around the corner, default rates declining, and all-in yields twice as high as they were in 2021, credit looks attractive, and we maintain our moderately overweight view. Tight credit spreads give us pause, but with strong demand for bonds and weak supply, we believe credit could be an attractive place to generate income with limited potential for spread widening.

We’re still observing moderate distress in issuers at the lower end of the quality spectrum, which indicates that the higher-for-longer rate regime is creating headwinds for some companies. But with rate cuts already arriving in some regions and imminent in others, we believe relief may be provided to some of the riskiest names.

Technical supply-and-demand dynamics could be a positive driver of price support. Demand for corporate bonds has been very strong, as investors seek to lock in attractive yields ahead of a rate-cutting cycle. But the size of the high-yield market (the supply of bonds available to and held by investors) has been shrinking as many companies graduate back to investment grade (IG) after being downgraded in recent years. Strong company balance sheets, robust refinancing year to date, and a limited mergers-and-acquisitions pipeline suggest supply may continue to be overwhelmed by demand going forward (FIGURE 3).

We’ve initiated a preference for high-yield credit over IG credit by moving our view on the latter from moderately overweight to neutral. We had previously seen IG credit as a good place to generate carry, with some potential for spread tightening. Much of this spread tightening played out in the first two months of the second quarter, which caused us to moderate our view. Since then, we’ve seen significant volatility in the European IG market, which has a large proportion of banks—potential targets of tax-raising measures that could be enacted by a newly elected government in France. We view this elevated political uncertainty as another reason to focus on higher-yielding parts of the credit markets.

Regionally, we have a slight preference for European high yield, funded from EM high yield. On valuation, Europe is where there’s still a bit of a premium left and potential for some tightening in spreads. We’re also turning more constructive on the European macro outlook, where momentum is improving and the central bank has already delivered a rate cut. We continue to monitor political developments in France (20% of the European high-yield market), which have caused spread widening in recent weeks, but we see this as an opportunity to add risk. In EMs, growth remains weak while many lower-rated idiosyncratic stories have played out, sometimes resulting in their spreads over-tightening relative to their fundamentals. Flows also remain lackluster.

Commodities: A Stronger View Fueled by Oil

We’ve moved from a neutral view on commodities to a moderately overweight view, driven by an upgrade to oil. We think oil looks fairly valued, with prices in the mid US $80s. However, we think a positive roll yield,⁶ which reflects the lower cost of longer-dated futures, warrants a more constructive stance.

We believe geopolitical risk in the Middle East limits downside to the price of oil, and with supportive growth dynamics globally and a tight supply, the price could remain range-bound at current levels. As a result, we believe that carry will primarily drive returns this year with some potential for capital gains if demand is stronger than expected or OPEC+ pricing power comes back into play.

Gold has been a strong performer in recent months, and we see limited further price appreciation from here as well as a negative outlook for carry, leaving us on the sidelines. Investors and central banks have been building gold allocations this year after weak sentiment in 2023, but with heightened geopolitical risks largely priced in, we think a lot of the positive case may have already played out. We’re waiting to see whether surging demand from retail investors in China will continue and whether central-bank buying can further support prices.

Downside risks include a reacceleration or spike in core inflation, leading central banks to push back against aggressive rate-cut expectations or even to resume hiking.

Risks

Downside risks to our views include a reacceleration or spike in core inflation, leading central banks to push back against aggressive rate-cut expectations or even to resume hiking. In addition, our expectation of more broad-based gains in equities could be undermined by sharp upward momentum in one or more mega-cap stocks. Finally, geopolitical issues will bear watching, including the potential for election-year turmoil in the US and Europe and a broader conflict in the Middle East.

Upside risks to our views include a scenario in which growth is more widespread globally and disinflation resumes, allowing central banks—and particularly the Fed—to cut rates faster than currently priced in by markets. We could also see a second-quarter earnings surprise on the upside, with a better earnings impulse outside of mega-cap tech stocks, and/or positive rotation in the market and better breadth than we expect. Additional upside risks include a resolution to the Middle East conflict and a balanced coalition emerging from the French election.